View Full Version : Northern Rock.
Onlyforfun
14th September 2007, 21:24
People queuing up to withdraw their money from a struggling bank? But I thought our glorious leaders said there was no problem?
When the lender of last resort starts lending there is a problem by definition. The sub-prime mess is not a surprise (maybe to politicians and CNBC), some of us have been arguing for a long time that it is a symbol that the credit bubble, created by rampant oversupply of money, is about to pop, when the only people left to lend to are those who can't pay you back, that is / was a good indicator.
Inflation is rampant and the West think they can fix it by massaging the CPI downwards, cutting rates and increasing teh money supply further. Absolute :censored: madness.
The later you hit the brakes, the bigger the accident.
vegyjones
14th September 2007, 21:31
Isn't all the people withdrawing their money only adding to the problem?
Onlyforfun
15th September 2007, 08:03
Yes indeed, but you don't want to be the last person in line to withdraw your money in case there is none left.
Win2Win
15th September 2007, 08:42
Thankfully the Betfair bank is sound, and my hidden account in Zimbabwe :yikes:
Littlegaz
15th September 2007, 10:55
There is a lot of the panic element and herd mentality to it - like the panic stripping of bread from the supermarket shelves after the first hint of a shortage.
That said, I'd probably do the same if I had money in Northern Rock. Doesn't seem to have hit the stock market particularly hard - at least not after the initial falls in July - but that may still be to come. I understand that the inter-bank loans fall for settlement quarterly, and with the current liquidity shortage there could well be some other major names in trouble at the end of this month.
Win2Win
15th September 2007, 11:16
They haven't even needed any money yet, they've only 'arranged' it just in case, same as we arrange an overdraft and may never use it.
vegyjones
15th September 2007, 12:20
They'll need it now?
But how likely is it that orthern Rock will fold?
And is there a danger that any other big banking names could follow?
i.e. Is it time to hide the money under the mattress like my nan used to :laugh
Win2Win
15th September 2007, 12:21
If they were in trouble, they'd just be bought out by one of the big boys, it's only cash flow, they'll still show a £74645345 Billion profit :(
Littlegaz
15th September 2007, 12:59
And if the big boys are in trouble?
Rumours about Barclays, in particular, are rife and there were long queues this morning outside both Northern Rock and Barclays in my local town centre.
Keith's right, though - this is a cash flow issue, not a profit issue. The initial reports on NR suggested profits are expected to "plummet by £147million." Read on to the smaller print and it transpires that this was from an initial forecast of £647m, leaving the poor souls a measly half billion. However, that's been revised given the publicity since Thursday and there's now speculation that NR will disappear "as a brand name" within the next few months.
TBH, I really can't see any of the big boys (Barclays, RBS/Natwest et al) being allowed to struggle - too much money and too many people involved, so the BoE will bail them out as it has with NR. But if your money's in the Locksbottom Bank plc then yes Vegy, take it out and stick it under the mattress.
bigcumba
15th September 2007, 13:12
It would be nice if Nr did disappear completely and left me mortgage free! I can dream can't I? :rolleyes:
vegyjones
15th September 2007, 13:15
That was something I had been thinking about?
Surely if NR went bust, they're creditors would be able to claim your property?
Or are you protected against that?
Littlegaz
15th September 2007, 13:28
Pretty sure you're not protected, but I stand to be corrected. A distribution in liquidation to creditors is achieved by turning whatever assets are available into cash, so in the case of a "bust" mortgage provider the liquidator would preusmably have the power to call in the mortgage lending. If the borrowers can't pay, then call in the security (ie repossess their houses and sell 'em :yikes:).
Big C - if you ask Vegy nicely perhaps he'll let you go and live with him :thumbs
Joking aside, it won't get to that stage (the repossessions, not Big C and Vegy co-habiting.) There'd be riots on the streets.
Onlyforfun
15th September 2007, 16:23
The asset the bank owns is the loan to you, unless you default, the collateral, i.e., your house, is yours, They can only sell on the loan but the T&C would be protected. Of course, you could get hit if you have a variable rate period after any fixed interest / discount deal and the new owners of your debt have a base rate + 2% policy.
Keith's right, though - this is a cash flow issue, not a profit issue.
Not really, the cost of their raw material (money) has increased while they have lent the money at a fixed rate.
Northern Rock borrowed money to make mortgages. They effectively borrow at base rate + say 0.12% as an AAA rated borrower and lend it on as a mortgage at base rate +1% or more. However, the rate they are being charged has jumped in the last month if they can find someone to borrow from at all given nobody wants mortgages as collateral. The more trouble they are in the worse their credit rating gets and the more it costs them to borrow.
Banking crises are easily caused by the very fact that no bank ever holds as much on deposit as it lends as mortagages. It is very hard for a bank to realise short term cash from a mortgage (you can't summarily call it in and if you could how many homeowners could raise the cash anyway), but of course, a depositor can walk in to the branch and demand his / her money now. In the current financial system that in itself shouldn't be too much problem as there is so much money floating around (M3 increasing between 12-15% per annum in most developed economies, estimated to be as much as 50% now in the USA, putting it on a par with Russia and China) that there is always someone to lend to a bank, but, now nobody wants mortgages as collateral and the interbank rate is so high that NR will have to borrow at 7%+ to fund mortgages typically yielding around 5-6%, so a 2% loss on their mortgage book will be their minimum financial penalty, and when you have the biggest mortgage book in the country and the smallest savings book, that could send it under.
Of course the Fed, ECB and Bank of England will print money to try to solve the problem (by making short term "emergency" loans etc) but that is what is causing the problems in the first place.
Win2Win
15th September 2007, 16:25
:doh That's what I said, but in a way the forum would understand :laugh
Onlyforfun
15th September 2007, 16:31
I hate to be pedantic (:ooo) but it is more of a credit flow problem than a cash flow problem.:D
Win2Win
15th September 2007, 19:07
They both begin with 'C' and for that reason it is simplied :rolleyes: ...besides, you have no credit....because you have no cash...:)
Onlyforfun
15th September 2007, 20:37
...besides, you have no credit....because you have no cash...:)
No need to get personal...:D
Merlin
16th September 2007, 00:29
Nice explanation Off....seems to me they are victims of their own strategy…..and their directors must take some of the blame…for the current crisis…
If I understand it correctly…they have placed all their eggs in one basket (as it were)….by ¨writing¨ lots of mortgages and not attracting enough savers…
Besides , I am sure I recall them doing something dodgy a few years ago…regarding switching savers accounts on to another scheme without informing them….
Onlyforfun
16th September 2007, 13:23
I get more and more annoyed by this story. The FSA and Bank of England both say Northern Rock is financially secure and solvent because the BoE, approved by the government have offered them unlimited funds that belong to the taxpayer.
Capitalism only works if companies that make poor decisions are allowed to fail. NR might not even fail without the loan as someone will lend at some price, but the Govt is effectively subsidising them, a poor risk / reward for public funds.
Not content with the world's worst ever gold trade, now this. If Brown and his crew worked for an investment bank they'd have been binned after 5 minutes.
Merlin
16th September 2007, 13:39
I think it Looks nearly certain they will be taken over....particularly if the run on withdrawals/account closing continue into next week…
They wont be able to function – will they…without intervention – which will effectively be a subsidy:yikes:…albeit at a cost…
Onlyforfun
16th September 2007, 13:52
Absolutely.
As Gaz said, most of the money they raise resets every 3 months. Something like half the short term paper that has matured since this all started has not been rolled, i.e., the borrower has taken the cash back, and that includes top-grade, non-mortgage backed paper.
So as their short term debt rolls, without the BoE stepping in, they would have to pay back their creditors by selling their assets, or with the money in deposit accounts / bonds etc. Obviously, now everyone knows they are in trouble the other banks won't lend knowing they can then pick apart the carcass to buy the loan book on the cheap.
Yet another example of official denial being close to confirmation these days, Mervyn King was criticising the other central banks for intervening and said as recently as Thursday that the BoE wouldn't follow suit....:splapme
Littlegaz
16th September 2007, 14:51
Pretty sure you're not protected, but I stand to be corrected....If the borrowers can't pay, then call in the security (ie repossess their houses and sell 'em ).
Corrected I stand. This is what happens:
Obviously, now everyone knows they are in trouble the other banks won't lend knowing they can then pick apart the carcass to buy the loan book on the cheap.
Littlegaz
16th September 2007, 14:53
I hate to be pedantic (:ooo) but it is more of a credit flow problem than a cash flow problem.:D
Now, that is pedantic :laugh
Credit flow/cash flow ........ chicken/egg?
presto
16th September 2007, 15:01
just out of interest - would now be a 'great' time to buy northern rock shares? as with all this overreaction and plummeting share price, you could buy the shares now 'reletively cheap' and when (if) a take over comes in then the shares would rise, which would surely increase the share price.
or is that an over simplyfied explanation from someone who knows bugger all about shares?
Onlyforfun
16th September 2007, 15:42
I wouldn't, as you run the risk of them becoming essentially worthless. Shareholders are the last people to be paid when a business liquidates.
They won't be able to sell the loans at anything like face value and after the creditors (soon to be the taxpayer) and depositors have had their money refunded there is unlikely to be any money left.
piggy
17th September 2007, 15:36
just out of interest - would now be a 'great' time to buy northern rock shares? as with all this overreaction and plummeting share price, you could buy the shares now 'reletively cheap' and when (if) a take over comes in then the shares would rise, which would surely increase the share price.
or is that an over simplyfied explanation from someone who knows bugger all about shares?
just the question i was going to ask as the shares have dropped like a stone today,
OFF posted
"I wouldn't, as you run the risk of them becoming essentially worthless. Shareholders are the last people to be paid when a business liquidates.
They won't be able to sell the loans at anything like face value and after the creditors (soon to be the taxpayer) and depositors have had their money refunded there is unlikely to be any money left."
takeovers by HBSC and lloyds tsb are allready being talked about and the governments open chequebook stance will surely make sure they never go under, so is there any real risk in buying NR shares or could a quick buck be earned? from what iv'e heard today NR is now vastly undervalued on the stock exchange, i'm no expert but i could be tempted into a little dabble if the share price drops any further.
Onlyforfun
17th September 2007, 17:55
I called the office today and our analyst reckons it's worth £1.80 ish. Basically, it cannot survive as an independent entity (the queues outside my local branch were mad today), and it is a buyers market. It has no forward PE to base a valuation on as it has no future without being bought out.
BUt
piggy
17th September 2007, 18:56
OFF help me out here as iv'e probably over simplified , NR are owed 6 times as much as they owe so even if they borrow £1billion to pay out to investors they are still owed £7billion so even if they have to pay 2% higher interest their income will still vastly outweigh their outgoings even taking into account defaulters, so even at worst case scenario they must be worth £4billion
gogga
17th September 2007, 19:06
Thankfully the Betfair bank is sound, and my hidden account in Zimbabwe :yikes:
Ha...ha... Keith....... GSOH as usual!!!!
Onlyforfun
17th September 2007, 19:29
OFF help me out here as iv'e probably over simplified , NR are owed 6 times as much as they owe so even if they borrow £1billion to pay out to investors they are still owed £7billion so even if they have to pay 2% higher interest their income will still vastly outweigh their outgoings even taking into account defaulters, so even at worst case scenario they must be worth £4billion
They are owed 7 times what they owe, but they also borrowed that in the 1st place on 3-6 month terms, and they have lent most of it in the form of mortages over 25 years. So teh savings they hold can be withdrawn with zero notice, the loans they have taken out can be withdrawn in 3-6 months but tehy can't get all the cash tehy have lent back for 25 years.
tophatter
17th September 2007, 22:16
I aint going to even pretend I know enough about banking and shares to make a proper comment on this.
The way it looks to me is that the shares will fall to a level that makes it attractive to be took over and then it will stabalise.
Looks like the government has decided they will do whatever it takes to stop jitters going through the whole system.
And if it ever come to the crunch we get a Nationalised major bank. To a layman like me that sounds like they are basically saying we will cover your debts becuase we can and we know its a cashflow (or credit flow :)) problem.
Dont know the politics and ramifications of it all but it does at least sound decisive and it looks like they have gone "all in" knowing they have a good enough hand and enough chips to win that hand.
Onlyforfun
18th September 2007, 13:44
The problem is they are only treating a symtom rather than the underlying problem. If the credit markets don't loosen up, and they won't until there is more clarity about who owes what to who, and in turn, you won't get clarity on that until Central Banks stop propping up the weakest links, the taxpayer will be saddled with £100 billion worth of mortgages. When you consider that the £24 billion savings that have been underwritten are about 1/16th of the national budget (1/3 of the defence budget or 1/5 of the health budget) you may change your mind!
Kaizer54
19th September 2007, 00:05
How can these institutions fail or even struggle when you look at sum you borrow and compare it to what you pay back over 25 years???
Merlin
19th September 2007, 00:14
How can these institutions fail or even struggle when you look at sum you borrow and compare it to what you pay back over 25 years???
Its a current liquidity problem......a credit flow crisis...Besides, strictly speaking, at the most, their mortgages are only 10 years old…….
tophatter
19th September 2007, 00:15
When you put it like that OFF then I suppose its pretty scary stuff - no wonder Alistair Darling sounded nervous on the Today show on Monday Morning.
I know you dont like Gordon Brown particularly but I think that was the first time we had missed him as chancellor because you know what he is like, he would have gone on the Today Show and just steamrollered James Naughtie and not aknowledged he was even asking any questions! Darling sounded very much like the new boy and probably got a smacked bum from Brown - can you imagine how intense it would have been especially as he used to be the chancellor - I bet he was all over Darling , imagine if Blair had tried to do that with his chancellor!!!
I just dread to think what Gideon Osbourne would have sounded like - lets hope they have a grip on it before there is a chance of a change of governemt because Im sure there would have been extraordainary pressures on a Tory chancellor who has never held office before basically saying he would Nationalise a bank if he had to!
Will all this malarky mean the house market slows down and the prospect of interest rates been cut? Surely that will just throw more petrol on the fire if this has all been caused by crazy borrowing. Don't you think people should just accept that interest rates are probably if anything still on the low side and just take it as a reminder that borrowing money actually comes at a price?
Merlin
19th September 2007, 00:31
Here is an article showing how over exposed Northern Rock are….
http://www.agorafinancial.com/5min/
tophatter
19th September 2007, 00:40
"the 237 year old Alan Greenspan" :laugh
Merlin
19th September 2007, 00:57
Great in it….the humour is just the way I like it….:laugh
Win2Win
19th September 2007, 08:53
Luckily, Nothern Rock sponsor Newcastle.....great exposure :doh .....the team is full of broken players......
Onlyforfun
19th September 2007, 09:05
I really like Agora Financial, the Daily Reckoning newsletter / website is awesome.
xerive
19th September 2007, 10:55
The chances of Northern Rock folding is ZERO. The chances of Northern Rock being taken over is 100% My money is on hsbc to buy them out.
Onlyforfun
19th September 2007, 13:05
Rumours of a £2/share take-out, Lloyds & HBoS "refusing to comment".
woopiedoo
19th September 2007, 17:11
Yes indeed, but you don't want to be the last person in line to withdraw your money in case there is none left.
I'd do the same if I had money in Northern Rock. Get out now!
vegyjones
19th September 2007, 17:39
Northern Rock is probably the safest place to have your savings now after the government issued a guarantee on them!
woopiedoo
19th September 2007, 18:16
Isn't all the people withdrawing their money only adding to the problem?
If I had money in there I would be doing the same thing.
woopiedoo
19th September 2007, 18:34
Yes indeed, but you don't want to be the last person in line to withdraw your money in case there is none left.
I wonder if Northern Rock are looking for bouncers and if the pay is good!:thumbs
woopiedoo
19th September 2007, 18:35
Now, that is pedantic :laugh
Credit flow/cash flow ........ chicken/egg?
I wonder if Northern Rock are looking for bouncers and if the pay is good!:thumbs
woopiedoo
19th September 2007, 18:39
People queuing up to withdraw their money from a struggling bank? But I thought our glorious leaders said there was no problem?
When the lender of last resort starts lending there is a problem by definition. The sub-prime mess is not a surprise (maybe to politicians and CNBC), some of us have been arguing for a long time that it is a symbol that the credit bubble, created by rampant oversupply of money, is about to pop, when the only people left to lend to are those who can't pay you back, that is / was a good indicator.
Inflation is rampant and the West think they can fix it by massaging the CPI downwards, cutting rates and increasing teh money supply further. Absolute :censored: madness.
The later you hit the brakes, the bigger the accident.
I wonder if Northern Rock are looking for bouncers and if the pay is good!
Win2Win
19th September 2007, 19:05
:doh Why the multiple posts? Same comments? :doh
bigcumba
19th September 2007, 19:35
:doh Why the multiple posts? Same comments? :doh
spooky innit
Win2Win
19th September 2007, 19:48
spooky innit
spooky innit
vegyjones
19th September 2007, 20:31
spooky innit
spooky innit
bigcumba
19th September 2007, 20:40
spooky innit
spooky innit
spooky innit
Merlin
19th September 2007, 20:43
innit
Merlin
19th September 2007, 20:44
spooky
bigcumba
19th September 2007, 20:48
spiky oonit
vegyjones
19th September 2007, 20:59
spiky milligoonit
bigcumba
19th September 2007, 21:05
moogy spinylikkit
Merlin
19th September 2007, 21:45
spunky mogulikit
mathare
19th September 2007, 22:02
spiky unit
bigcumba
20th September 2007, 06:57
spankme gollum
Win2Win
20th September 2007, 09:01
Maybe Northern Rock could learn something from this thread :doh
Onlyforfun
20th September 2007, 10:42
Under no ccircumstances should Mervyn King be given another term, cock-up from start to finish.
The number 1 rule for a central banker is to be decisive, even, and especially, when you suspect you might be wrong.
First, there will be no rescue
then, there will be a partial rescue
then, there will be a full rescue
finally, we will provide £10billion of 3month lending
The City is not impressed. It doesn't help when the Chancellors hands are shaking when he talks to the press about it! I suspect the hand of Brown at work in the final outcome (just wish he'd made it happen sooner - if they had to go down this route)
Onlyforfun
17th March 2008, 10:28
Well, the Yanks have shown us how to deal with these things, Bear Stearns runs out of cash and it is bought for $2 share by a competitor over the weekend.
Win2Win
17th March 2008, 12:04
Bargain.....now how many 1000's are going to lose jobs in the next 1-2 years as the companies 'blend'?
Dealt with efficiently for business, not for the general public.
Onlyforfun
17th March 2008, 15:59
Bargain.....now how many 1000's are going to lose jobs in the next 1-2 years as the companies 'blend'?
Dealt with efficiently for business, not for the general public.
Not quite with you there.
More jobs wouldl be lost if Bear Stearns went bust.
The public good is not always best measured in terms of job losses (and N Rock looks like it will shed 2000-2500 in the next few weeks) as the default of a major bank has potential knock on effects throughout the economy. Not to mention the cost to the US taxpayer is probably limited to $30 million, compared to liabilities of around $200 million that the UK taxpayer took on through nationalisation of NR.
Sure, JP Morgan are getting a bargain, but that is their reward for staying solvent through the current crisis - when all is said and done, Bears value is now what another bank can afford to / is willing to pay for it. Should companies or individuals be penalised for having foresight and making a profit for doing so? If you think that any wealth gained this way is somehow immoral, where is the motivation to create wealth for oneself?
Win2Win
17th March 2008, 18:52
They could have nationalised it. :rolleyes:
Didn't the US reserve put up a few $Billion of tax payers money as a guarantee, much much more than Northern Rock, and I don't think NR wiped Billions of pension funds, ISA's, etc around the world.
Wouldn't happen with the Branson name....we all love a virgin.....eh John? :wink
Onlyforfun
18th March 2008, 14:32
Didn't the US reserve put up a few $Billion of tax payers money as a guarantee, much much more than Northern Rock, and I don't think NR wiped Billions of pension funds, ISA's, etc around the world.
Not to mention the cost to the US taxpayer is probably limited to $30 million, compared to liabilities of around $200 million that the UK taxpayer took on through nationalisation of NR.
Not to mention plenty of pension funds held Northern Rock shares.
Win2Win
18th March 2008, 15:34
I think the worlds pension funds took a bit more of a hit this week, than from Northern Rock in Geordie Land. :)
As I live up in the Welsh mountains, maybe I should get the wife to start digging for gold in the garden! :thumbs
Win2Win
25th March 2008, 10:40
So all is not so sweet and sorted at Bears as first thought then.
Seems the threat of legal action has mysteriously made the offer go from $2 to $10, but even this may not stop the action. It appears in the US it is better for shareholders if the bank goes bust, but the government will not allow that, so now they have themselves in a bit of a pickle with the threat of court action that could drag on for years.
Smokeyone
25th March 2008, 13:16
Still Northern Rock but slightly different topic. Just spent 20 minutes arguing with NR over new security question.
What is the exact date you opened the account ! Who knows the correct answer because I don't. The computer picked this new question to answer and that was that, I said I'll close the account, they said write in.
In the end I spoke to someone with a bit more sense who told me that was the new security question. I managed to sort it out in the end.
Hands up who knows the date they opened their bank/savings etc account.
Bye the bye, no letter from NR mentioning this new security thingy...
vBulletin® v3.8.1, Copyright ©2000-2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.