Cookie Policy: This web site uses cookies. By using this site you agree to our cookie policy.
Disclaimer: By posting on this web site it is accepted that you have agreed to the T&C. This is an information forum, and it is just that information, all views are of the individual poster and not that of the site owner. Please DO NOT publish copyrighted material without the owners permission. If you copy news or articles include a link back to the original site. Threads/Posts may be deleted on request. No other links without permission.
BEFORE POSTING A QUESTION: Your question has probably been asked before, so please use the
SEARCH FUNCTION, as we grow tired of answering the same question again and again.
Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Combined systems ?

  1. #1

    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Rugby
    Posts
    674
    Rep Power
    37

    Combined systems ?

    looking for a bit of advice
    is it ok to combine systems to run from one bank ?
    if it is do they need to be around the same strike rate or same number of qualifiers ?
    Thanks



  2. #2

    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Posts
    10,445
    Rep Power
    114
    You can run from the same bank - it is easier to both keep track of systems and protect your investment by using seperate banks for each system. It is imperative that you are extra vigilant in your record-keeping because a system that is going through a bad patch can easily wipe out the whole bank because the wrong stakes were being used.

    E.G. If you have a £200 bank and are using 3% for the first system and 2% for the other one, you MUST treat this as 2 seperate banks of £100 for recording purposes so that your stakes are £3 and £2 respectively and not £6 and £4 (based on the whole bank). Use a spreadsheet to keep track of things so that a poor performer doesn't drag down a good one.



  3. #3

    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Rugby
    Posts
    674
    Rep Power
    37
    Thanks for the advice



  4. #4

    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    N Wales
    Posts
    50,310
    Rep Power
    275
    Yes you can, but it may prove unprofitable as no research has been done.

    I 'blend' systems, but only after doing the maths over 5-10 years of results.

    FREE Live Odds Comparison Software

    Keith Driscoll - Administrator
    Managing Director, Win2Win Limited



    Filipino UK Filipino Forum | Win2Win Racing - Free Tips


  5. #5

    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Rugby
    Posts
    674
    Rep Power
    37
    Thanks
    i will into it some more



  6. #6

    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    2,493
    Rep Power
    59
    keep em seperate , one system underperforming can halt the growth of others if you combine them in a % style bank

    ‘All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing’


  7. #7

    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Rugby
    Posts
    674
    Rep Power
    37
    Thanks for the advice, i think i will keep them all seperate



Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Lay systems
    By Outside Chance in forum Horse Racing Systems Help , Advice, Info, Ideas, Rules, Testing, etc
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 16th May 2005, 16:26
  2. Mathare's Systems - New Systems Added
    By mathare in forum Horse Racing Systems Help , Advice, Info, Ideas, Rules, Testing, etc
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 13th September 2003, 22:36

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Free Tips | Betting Advice | UK Horse Racing Tips | Free Bets | Staking Advice | Horse Racing Systems | Horse Racing Lays | Laying System | UK Horse Racing Tips | lay betting